Primary school pedagogy and teaching in college

The other day my daughter’s school invited to christmas celebration. Besides a really lovely program they prepared and shared with the guests, I talked to her teacher and was startled: What they do there in this small primary school is trigger the individual potential of every single child AND teach them the basics! At the same time! Simultaneously, so to speak.

The teacher recalled an incident with a school practicant: The practicant explained currency values and let the children calculate with them. The children acted little stories of buying and selling and instead of filling out form sheets, they discussed WHAT to buy and sell.They where busy for quite some time with this task. The practicant was getting nervous and wanted to end the “game”, but the teacher stopped her. Learning, he explained, was going on the exact moment when the children started to extrapolate the given task and were NOT thinking about the form sheet anymore. So why bother about that more than necessary to fill it out AFTER the learning situation?

I continued talking with the teacher and learned once more: Lots of primary schools spoil the learning desire in children during the first six months they are schooled. Instead of triggering what is inside of every single child, teachers put enormous effort in imposing what has to be learned on the children.

The same holds true for teaching in college: You have to consider and count on the knowledge and experience the students bring into your classroom. As a good teacher you have to develop and know methods to trigger what is inside – not so much to impose you own knowledge. This might be a paradigm shift. And it includes working together – with the students and with your team.

PS: In Looking through “Authentic Learning” in #change11 I just found corresponding research: Alex’s blogentry proves that creative children in the classroom are watched as being disturbing rather than welcome. Transferred to college settings I’d stick with Jan Herrington:

“So in a physical sense, it is easy to organize, but in a pedagogical sense it is actually very challenging to plan and enact because of the need to cleverly design an all encompassing task, and deal with the limitations imposed by curriculum requirements and institutional restraints.”

We will have to do all we can to foster authentic learing and thus get the creativity out of our students. We, every single one who teaches. We, the teaching staff as a whole in a given course or department. We – together with our students.

Writing a blog (post)

Jupidu recently expressed my thoughts: Starting a blog and filling it with blogposts does not depend on the question if and how many comments my writing may arise.

  • It is a matter of expressing yourself,
  • filing your thoughts,
  • archiving ideas in a networked way,
  • leaving and eventually provoking the possibility to develop ideas even further with comments and in discourse/discussion/conversation.

The beginning of a blog must be found in yourself, though. Outside motivation could be a trigger, in best cases, nothing more. MOOC got me hooked. I found my motivation for blogging in MOOC. Let’s see…

The power of words

Yesterday a collegue told me something new: that she was attending a MOOC, a massive open online course. Named change11. – In listening to her all of a sudden something was changing inside myself: MOOC was hooking me. Never good in remembering names or difficult scientific expressions, not to speak about acronyms, MOOC was hooking me immediately. I had to have a look. I had to sign up. As if some unknown source was pulling me in.

#change11 even drove me into remembering my blog, long time abandoned. For that reason I am writing here right now. Still rather unassertive about the sustainable quality of this revival, though. I know me. And I know that I am not the extrovert guy writing about herself a lot. Maybe MOOC turns out to be a topic enough. Maybe.

What I especially liked about the conversation with my collegue yesterday was the language philosphical aspect emerging immediately while talking about the topics in #change11 MOOC: Would talking about theorectical concepts in a didactic field become clearer when you’d try to translate it from your mothertongue into a foreign language or vice versa? I said yes, because the different languages would act like a filter – the more filter you’d apply, the better the output. In natural sciences, my collegue replied, it never made any difference for her to read something in English or German or any other known language. Different in humanities, I’d say.